This scientific article is devoted to the comparative analysis of the distinctive features in the concepts of “evidence”, “proving” and individual evidence in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Tajikistan and the Russian Federation. Based on the materials of judicial practice, the features of securing certain types of evidence are identified and conclusions are presented that are important for the scientific community. The purpose of this study is to identify the main differences in the definitions and understanding of these concepts in the criminal procedure legislation of these countries, as well as to analyze their impact on the process of proof in criminal cases. In particular, the researcher critically evaluates the breadth of the concept of “evidence” established in Russian legislation, which is essential for determining the exact list of sources of evidence, which makes it universal, but different from the norm established in the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. The results obtained in the course of the study can be useful for further optimization of criminal procedure legislation and increasing the effectiveness of justice both in foreign legislation and in Russia in terms of maintaining a balance of private and public legal relations. For example, analysis of foreign experience allows us to identify the most effective mechanisms for protecting the rights of suspects and accused persons, as well as to optimize procedural deadlines and the procedure for proving. In addition, the data obtained can be used to develop new measures aimed at increasing access to justice and ensuring fair law enforcement.
criminal procedure, evidence, process of proof, features of evidence, sources of evidence
1. Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation no. 174-FZ of December 18, 2001. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 2023, June 20. (In Russ.)
2. 20 iyunya.
3. Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Tajikistan dated December 3, 2009 (as amended by the Laws of the Republic of Tajikistan. no. 982, 983 dated July 22, 2013.) AMORT. 2009. No. 12. Art. 816. (In Russ.)
4. Kornakova S. V. Norms on evidence and proof in criminal proceedings of the CIS countries: a comparative legal analysis. Lex russica, 2020, vol. 73, no. 11, pp. 148–156. (In Russ.)
5. Semenov V. A. Procedural methods and forms of collecting evidence under the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. Proceedings of the Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of the Republic of Tajikistan. 2018. No. 1. Pp. 75–82. (In Russ.)
6. Civil Code of the Russian Federation (part one) no. 51-FZ of November 30, 1994. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, 1994, December 8. (In Russ.)
7. Sentence of the Zadnepropetrovsky District Court of Smolensk no. 1-460/2021 1-84/2022 1-9/2023 of September 28, 2023 in case no. 1-460/2021. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/e0itVGyCDTVr/?regular-txt (accessed 12.06.2024). (In Russ.)
8. Abdulloev P. S. The Concept of Evidence in the Criminal Procedure Law of Russia (Topical Issues) Journal of Moscow University. Series 11. Law, 2012, no. 2, pp. 99–109. (In Russ.)
9. Novikov A. M., Khoryanov S. N. Problems of Assessing and Using the Results of Operational-Investigative Activities in the Process of Proving. Current Problems of the State and Law, 2022, no. 6, pp. 429–436. (In Russ.)
10. Advocate Newspaper: The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation Reminded That the Court Has No Right to Refer to the Evidence Available in a Criminal Case Without Examining It. URL: https://www.advgazeta.ru/novosti/vs-napomnil-chto-sud-ne-vprave-ssylatsya-na-imeyushchiesya-v-ugolovnom-dele-dokazatelstva-bez-ikh-issledovaniya/ (accessed 12.06.2024). (In Russ.)
