Russian Federation
The main attention in the presented work is paid to the problem of identifying the causes of corrupt behavior and anti-corruption measures. The authors have identified groups of causes of corrupt behavior. Special attention is paid to the role of empathy in involvement in corruption crimes. Based on the theoretical analysis carried out, the authors note the insufficiency of studying the psychological, in particular the emotional, component of the formation of corrupt behavior. On the example of the specific professional activity of prison system employees interacting with persons convicted of various crimes, the presence of a contradiction is demonstrated, consisting, on the one hand, in the need for a correctional officer to have the ability to sympathize and empathize with convicts, and on the other — to counteract manipulative influences focused on the emotional sphere of the individual. The necessity of taking into account the role of empathy in the formation of an anti-corruption standard of behavior of employees of the penitentiary system is substantiated.
correction, correctional institutions, corruption, criminological signs, criminology, convicts, employees, penal enforcement system, empathy
1. Dictionaries and encyclopedias on the Academician. URL: https://translate.academic.ru/corruptio/la/ru / (accessed 27.11.2020). (In Russ.)
2. Khabibulin A. K. Corruption as a threat to national security: methodology, problems and ways to solve them. Journal of Russian Law, 2007, no. 2 (122), pp. 45-50. (In Russ.)
3. Girko S. I., Lesnikov G. Yu. Public safety and anti-corruption in the Russian Federation. Socio-political Sciences, 2014, no. 3, pp. 22-25. (In Russ.)
4. Ershov Yu. G. Corruption as a threat to statehood. Actual problems of scientific support of the state policy of the Russian Federation in the field of anti-corruption, 2019, no. 1, pp. 80-90. (In Russ.)
5. Korobov A. S. Financial incentive measures as an element of the system of administrative and legal means of countering corruption in the penitentiary system of the Russian Federation. Man: crime and punishment, 2012, no. 4 (79), pp. 128-130. (In Russ.)
6. Ponomareva E. V. Economic components of corruption in the penal system. Man: crime and punishment, 2014, no. 3 (86), pp. 118-124. (In Russ.)
7. Burtsev Yu. A. Corruption in Russia: causes and methods of struggle. Transport business of Russia, 2017, no. 2, pp. 66-67. (In Russ.)
8. Dikaev S. U. Corruption - the eternal problem of Russia. Criminology: yesterday, today, tomorrow, 2011, no. 4, pp. 48-51. (In Russ.)
9. Kurakin A. V. Administrative and legal means of combating corruption in the public service system. Journal of Russian Law, 2003, no. 7, pp. 79-89. (In Russ.)
10. Minenok M. G. On the issue of the fight against corruption. Bulletin of the Baltic Federal University named after I. Kant. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences, 2013, no. 9, pp. 88-93. (In Russ.)
11. Tonkov E. E. Corruption as a sign of criminalization of power. Criminological Journal of the Baikal State University of Economics and Law, 2011, no. 3, pp. 50-58. (In Russ.)
12. Shpaltakov V. P. Corruption in Russia: historical roots and causes of proliferation in the post-Soviet period. Bulletin of Omsk University. The series “Economics”, 2016, no. 3, pp. 83-92. (In Russ.)
13. Litvyak L. G., Plygunov K. A., Katasonov A. V. Corruption in Russia: history and modernity. Historical and socio-educational thought, 2015, vol. 7, no. 4, pp. 35-39. (In Russ.)
14. Nikonorov E. A. Corruption in the internal affairs bodies as a kind of corruption crime. Bulletin of the Moscow University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2016, no. 2, pp. 179-181. (In Russ.)
15. Rudkovskaya E. V., Voichenko N. V. Problems of corruption in the Russian Federation. Bulletin of the Kamchatka State Technical University, 2017, no. 33, pp. 76-82. (In Russ.)
16. Larina O. G., Sheveleva S. V. The legal experience of Russia in the field of combating corruption: history and modernity. All-Russian Criminological Journal, 2013, no. 3, pp. 179-187. (In Russ.)
17. Ishchenko E. P. On the corruption symbiosis of elected power and organized crime. All-Russian Criminological Journal, 2010, no. 2, pp. 41-50. (In Russ.)
18. Savchenko I. A., Snegireva L. A., Ustinkin S. V. The causes of corruption in the cross-methodological dimension. Power, 2018, no. 5, pp. 35-39. (In Russ.)
19. Ivanova A. A. Corruption: some problems of counteraction. Actual problems of economics and law, 2016, no. 4 (40), pp. 18-26. (In Russ.)
20. The Criminal Code of the Russian Federation no. 1-FZ of January 8, 1997 (as amended of November 23, 2020, with amendments of December 28, 2020). URL: http://www.consultant.ru/document/cons_doc_LAW_12940/96b96954939c0b7a44989a0798a178283af8ddd4 / (accessed 27.11.2020). (In Russ.)
21. Sukhodolov A. P., Ivantsov S. V., Sidorenko E. L., Spasennikov B. A. Domestic corruption in Russia: basic criminological parameters. All-Russian Journal of Criminology, 2018, no.12 (5), pp. 634-640. (In Russ.)
22. Sidorenko E. L. On the issue of new directions of criminological monitoring of corruption. Russian Journal of Economics and Law, 2016, no. 1 (37), pp. 17-25. (In Russ.)
23. Batson K. D., Ahmad N. Yu. Using empathy to improve intergroup relations and relationships. Social problems and policy review, 2009, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 141-177.
24. Alaeva M. V. Empathy as one of the tools for understanding the mental state of another person. Engineering technologies and systems, 2011, no. 2, pp. 102-105. (In Russ.)
25. Allport G. U. The Nature of Prejudice. Perseus Books, Cambridge, Massachusetts. 1954.
26. Boag E., Wilson D. Internal experience: empathy and prejudice towards prisoners. Journal of Criminal Psychology, 2014, no. 4, pp. 33-43.
27. Davis M. H. Measuring individual differences in empathy: evidence of a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1983, vol. 44, no. 1, pp. 113-126.
28. Pettigrew T. F., Tropp L. R. How do intergroup contacts reduce prejudice? Meta-analytical tests of three mediators. European Journal of Social Psychology, 2008, vol. 38, no. 6, pp. 922-934.
29. Bochkareva S. V. The truth of dialogue: socionic research or empathic cognition of Another. Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University, 2011, no. 2, pp. 111-115. (In Russ.)
30. Klimenkova E. N. Development of the ability to empathy in adolescence and adolescence. Disertation candidate of psychological sciences. Moscow, 2019. (In Russ.)
31. Makarova E. D. Education of empathy as a professional and personal quality of future social educators in the holistic educational process of the pedagogical college. Disertation candidate of Pedagogical Sciences. Petrozavodsk, 2006. (In Russ.)
32. Lobanova E. S. On aspects of training correctional officers in ways of interacting with women sentenced to imprisonment using manipulation . Penal enforcement system at the present stage: interaction of science and practice, 2016, pp. 366-368. (In Russ.)
33. Mustafayeva E. M. The phenomenon of personality manipulation in the works of French researchers. North Caucasian Psychological Bulletin, 2013, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 14-17. (In Russ.)
34. Tanasov G. G., Sysoeva O. A. Manipulation in a woman’s relationship with a man. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series 3: Pedagogy and Psychology, 2011, no. 1, pp. 152-157. (In Russ.)
35. Novikov A. V., Suslov Yu. E., Fedorov A. F. Manipulative behavior of convicted women with young children held in children’s homes at correctional institutions. Issues of Russian and international law, 2019, vol. 9, no. 3-1, pp. 276-284. (In Russ.)
36. Gudina O. A. Manipulation and its types in pedagogical discourse. Language and culture, 2011, no. 2 (14), pp. 13-21. (In Russ.)
37. Talloch B. Protection from manipulation by criminal offenders. 2010. https://csa.intersearch.com.au/csajspui/bitstream/10627/456/1/Guarding-against-Manipulation-by-Criminal-Offenders.pdf (accessed 23.03.2022).
