employee
National research Lobachevsky State university of Nizhny Novgorod (department of forensic expertise, associate professor)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
The formation of a system of evidence in a criminal case and the adoption of a final procedural decision on this basis is an indicator of the determination of the circumstances to be proved. However, not all the circumstances specified in Art. 73 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation find direct confirmation in the framework of a criminal case. In particular, circumstances conducive to the commission of crimes are often identified formally and rarely supported by concrete evidence. This is due, on the one hand, to the satisfaction in the process of proof with the typical reasons and conditions for the commission of the crime, on the other, to the lack of procedural means to establish them. The authors consistently substantiate and propose as a new procedural means of expert establishment of the circumstances (causes and conditions) that contributed to the commission of crimes, judicial anti-corruption expertise to identify and evaluate corruption factors in legal acts and their projects.
procedural means, proof, proof; circumstances conducive to the commission of crimes, the reasons and conditions for the commission of crimes, determinants of crime, corruption factors, criminogenic factors, anti-corruption expertise, forensic examination
1. The Code of Criminal Procedure no. 174-FZ of December 18, 2001. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
2. Code of Criminal Procedure of the RSFSR (as amended by the Decree of the Presidium of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR of August 08, 1983). Vedomosti of the Supreme Council of the RSFSR, 1983, no. 32, art. 1153. (In Russ.)
3. Philosophical dictionary / ed. by M. M. Rosenthal and P. F. Yudin. Moscow: Political Literature Publ., 1963. 544 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kudryavtsev V. N. Causality in criminology. On the structure of individual criminal behavior. Moscow: Yurid. lit. Publ., 1968. 176 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kuznetsova N. V. Problems of criminological determination. Moscow: Moscow un-t Publ., 1984. 208 p. (In Russ.)
6. On some issues of the practice of the courts in cases of corruption-related crimes: decisions of the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of December 9, 2010. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
7. Verdict of the Chertkovsky District Court of the Rostov Region no. 1-100/2020, 1-11/2021 of March 29, 2021 in case no. 1-100/2020. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/GZOH1Zjh3moN/ (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
8. Verdict of the Shirinsky District Court of the Republic of Khakassia no. 1-32/2021 of March 25, 2021 in case no. 1-32/2021. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/AlurGAMeYzUC/ (accessed: 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
9. Sentence of the Sharlyk District Court of the Orenburg Region no. 1-10/2021, 1-109/2020 of March 3, 2021 in case no. 1-10/2021. URL: https://sudact.ru/regular/doc/ydWs7KFV4XxQ/ (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
10. Ideas on the adoption of measures to eliminate circumstances that contributed to the commission of a crime (other violations of the law) issued by the of June 29, 2015 to the head of the REU of the residential district “Slavyanka”. URL: https://slavyanka.izora.info/news/6165/ (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
11. Submissions on the adoption of measures to eliminate the circumstances that contributed to the commission of the crime (other violations of the law) made to the of February 3, 2014. Director of the MOU OOSH no. 22 of Cheremkhovo. URL: https://ru.calameo.com/read/001877382de7ded5dc5d0 (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
12. Kashanina T. V. Legal technique: textbook. 2nd edition. Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M Publ., 2011. 496 p. (In Russ.)
13. On Combating Corruption: federal law no. 273-FZ of December 25, 2008. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
14. About Anti-corruption Examination of Regulations and Drafts of Regulations: federal law no. 172-FZ of July 17, 2009. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 20.10.2021). (In Russ.)
15. Afanasyev A. Yu. Corruption risks of evidentiary law in criminal proceedings (pre-trial proceedings). Dissertation... candidate of legal sciences. Nizhny Novgorod, 2016. 279 p. (In Russ.)
16. Goncharov D. Yu. The possibilities of anti-corruption expertise in the investigation of corruption crimes. Business in law. Economic and legal journal, 2011, no. 4, pp. 90-94. (In Russ.)
17. Kudryavtsev V. N. Law, act, responsibility. Moscow: Science Publ., 1986. 448 p. (In Russ.)
18. Afanasyev A. Yu., Lubin A. F., Milovidova M. A. Judicial anti-corruption examination of legal acts. Legal science and practice: Bulletin of the Nizhny Novgorod Academy of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2015, no. 3 (31), pp. 36-39. (In Russ.)
