Currently, the means of cellular communication have ceased to be used for their intended purpose. Mobile phones contain a huge amount of information: data on connections between subscribers and subscriber devices, information constituting bank secrecy, personal data, etc. In the article the author justifies the need to inspect the contents of mobile communication facilities by court decision, proposes to amend the Criminal Procedure Code of the Russian Federation in the context of the issue under consideration.
electronic media, mobile communications, inspection, seizure, constitutional rights, criminal proceedings
1. January-December 2020. URL: https://mvd.rf /reports/1 (accessed 05.10.2021). (In Russ.)
2. Tretyakov E. I. Mobile phone as a source of criminalistically important information. Bulletin of the Ural Financial and Legal Institute, 2018, no. 3 (13), pp. 49-51. (In Russ.)
3. Verdict of the Orenburg District Court no. 1-49/2020. URL: https://sudact.ru (accessed 05.10.2021). (In Russ.)
4. Resolution no. 1-350/2020 of the Berdsk City Court. URL: https://sudact.ru (accessed 05.10.2021). (In Russ.)
5. The Constitution of the Russian Federation. Adopted by popular vote of December 12, 1993 (with changes approved during the all-Russian vote of July 1, 2020). URL: http://publication.pravo.gov.ru/0001202007040001 (accessed 25.10.2021). (In Russ.)
6. On banks and banking activities: federal law no. 395-1 of December 2, 1990. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 15.10.2021). (In Russ.)
7. The code of criminal procedure of the Russian Federation. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 15.10.2021). (In Russ.)
8. The appeal decision of the Supreme court of the Russian Federation in case no. 2-18/08 of September 30, 2014. URL: https://sudact.ru (accessed 13.10.2021). (In Russ.)
9. Yakovlev A. N. Legal status of digital information extracted from computer and mobile devices: “E-mail”. Bulletin of the Voronezh Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia, 2014, no. 4, pp. 42-48. (In Russ.)
10. Verdict of the Leninsky District Court of Ufa, Republic of Bashkortostan no. 1-193/2017. URL: https://sudact.ru (accessed 13.10.2021). (In Russ.)
11. Cassation ruling of the Astrakhan Regional Court no. 22-3103/2011. URL: https://sudact.ru (accessed 13.10.2021). (In Russ.)
12. On the refusal to accept for consideration the complaint of citizen Sandakova Irina Sergeevna about the violation of her constitutional rights by paragraph 5 of the second part of Article 29 and part three of Article 182 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation: determination of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation no. 204-O of January 26, 2017. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 15.10.2021). (In Russ.)
13. On the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation: federal constitutional law no. 1-FKZ of July 21, 1994. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 15.10.2021). (In Russ.)
14. On the courts of general jurisdiction in the Russian Federation: federal constitutional law no. 1-FKZ of February 7, 2011. Access from the reference legal system “ConsultantPlus” (accessed 15.10.2021). (In Russ.)
