employee from 01.01.2007 until now
Rossiyskiy gumanitarnyy nauchnyy fond pri Pravitel'stve Rossiyskoy Federacii (ekspert)
employee
Russian Federation
The article analyzes the issue of the place and role of source studies in the structure of modern jurisprudence through the prism of a paradigm approach — assessment of the process of formation, formalization and recognition in the scientific community as a new research direction in legal science. The author shows the main trends in the disciplinary isolation of source studies in the social sciences and humanities and, against this background, characterizes the processes of formation of the source study direction in jurisprudence. Particular attention is paid to the problem of positioning legal source studies as a direction in the structure of legal science.
science of science, social sciences and humanities, legal science, source studies in jurisprudence, sources of knowledge of the state and law, interdisciplinarity in jurisprudence
1. Danilevsky I. N., Kabanov V. V., Medushushskaya O. M., Rumyantseva M. F. Source study: Theory. Story. Method. Sources of Russian history. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2004. 701 p. (In Russ.)
2. Ermolaeva O. A., Frolov D. E. General scientific and social philosophical status of the paradigm approach. Humanitarian, 2008, no. 7, pp. 102-112. (In Russ.)
3. Source study. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publ., 2015. 685 p. (In Russ.)
4. Kovalchenko I. D. Methods of historical research. Moscow: Nauka Publ., 1987. 440 p. (In Russ.)
5. Kuhn T. The structure of scientific revolutions / transl. from English. Moscow: Izd AST Publ., 2003. 605 p. (In Russ.)
6. Marchenko M. N. Sources of law. Moscow: Prospekt Publ., 2005. 759 p. (In Russ.)
7. Medushevsky O. M. Theory and methodology of cognitive history. Moscow: RGGU Publ., 2008. 358 p. (In Russ.)
8. Medushevsky A. N. Cognitive-informational theory in modern humanitarian knowledge. Russian history, 2009, no. 4, pp. 2-22. (In Russ.)
9. Khomich E. V. Paradigm. The latest philosophical dictionary. Minsk: V. M. Skakun Publ., 1998. Pp. 504-505. (In Russ.)
10. Yudin B. G. Disciplinary matrix. New philosophical encyclopedia. Moscow: Thought Publ., 2010, vol. 1, pp. 673-674. (In Russ.)
